DIAGNOSING AND ADDRESSING THE FAILURE OF PRIVATE UNIVERSITY LEADERS TO KEEP PACE WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Abstract

The scientific developments that accompanied social change and the modernization of societies that preceded modest nations scientifically and socially led to the creation of a significant gap in dealing with external and internal variables. Internal changes, whether positive or negative, have a fundamental impact on the structure of society. Positive changes that contribute to a fundamental pillar of societal behavior were accompanied by negative, immediate variables that contradict the positive approach to rapid development. This study diagnosed a specific strategic area that supports scientific development: the failure of private university leaders to keep pace with the scientific and administrative developments of institutions in developed countries. We must also recognize that failure is not limited to private institutions but also includes government academic institutions. Indicators have been developed for diagnosis and potential treatment, identifying the causes and means of addressing them to advance the scientific reality at the level of the leadership of these influential institutions, The opening of many universities without taking into consideration the geographical and cultural reality of the locations where academic institutions are built, without preparing a comprehensive study of the economic, cultural and scientific feasibility, has led to a clear slowdown in the performance of global quality compared to the basis for their establishment. The poor selection of those charged with managing these sensitive university leaders has led to a identifiable failure by those making fateful decisions related to scientific development. Poor leadership has led to a sharp decline in the academic level, whether for the middle leadership who lacks solid scientific experience due to their academic background from external and internal structural universities due to tribal, religious, partisan affiliations, favoritism and nepotism. due to their interaction with a segment of students of knowledge and science.